UPDATED! See here.
For those who don’t know, Nikon doesn’t make battery grips for its lower-end DSLRs. The advantage to this? The pricetag is a lot lower on a third-party grip. The problem? Well, there are a few issues one wouldn’t expect with an official product from Nikon.
I got my “professional vertical battery grip” through Amazon here. There are a handful of different sellers, and I can’t vouch for any of them besides New Harbor (though at that time, the shipment was fulfilled through Amazon when I ordered). I bought mine for around $25. Interestingly enough, while it was advertised as being made by Neewer, the packaging and product itself is labeled Meike.
The Pros: For a $25 product, it seems surprisingly solid. Of course, it doesn’t have quite the heft of the MB-D80, but at nearly $100 less than that model, it’s certainly not as chintzy as you might expect. Despite being a bit light, it gains a little weight when you put the batteries in. The plastic is molded more or less to the camera body, though again, it’s not as tight a fit as the MB-D80 on the D90 body. If you don’t have anything to compare it to, I’m sure it’s fine. That’s just nitpicking. The texture is speckled like the rest of the body, so it blends pretty well and looks pretty much like the D90 with its battery grip.
The vertical shutter works great, and the half-button press to auto-focus actually seems a little bit better than on the MB-D80 (that one has always seemed a bit too sensitive for me). It’s lacking a lock button for the shutter, but it’s more recessed than the shutter on the MB-D80 and I haven’t accidentally hit it once (yet). There’s also no AE/AF-L button, but that’s something I hardly ever use, anyway, so it’s not missed.
The Cons: The biggest complaint that everyone talks about is the sync cable that runs from the grip to the GPS port on the side of the camera. Sure, they could’ve made the cable a teensy bit shorter, but in reality, it’s not that big of a deal. Honestly, when I’m shooting, or even grabbing the camera out of my bag, I hardly ever notice it. So what’s the big deal? Mainly, unless you rig it with some tape, it leaves your ports wide open to dust. Oooooh, dust. I could care less seeing as I never use the ports, anyway. But I could definitely see where this would be problematic for some. Plus, there’s the rain factor. While the D3100 isn’t weather proof by any means, having a bunch of exposed ports definitely wouldn’t be a good thing, even in light rain.
So do you really even need the cable? Well, only if you want to use the vertical shutter release. Chances are, if you bought the grip, you’ll want to use the vertical shutter release. So yeah, you’re pretty much hosed in that department.
Second big issue that no one seems to mention (that I’ve read, at least) is the fact that the D3100 doesn’t visually distinguish on the LCD between one and two batteries. With the D90 you get a nifty display showing you just how much juice you got left in each battery (it even labels them left and right). Unfortunately, with the D3100’s battery grip, all you get is the same old battery icon. I haven’t used it enough to know if it tells you the juice for an individual battery at a time or if it’s showing total battery capacity remaining. Time will tell on that one, but either way it’s certainly not as intuitive.
Summary: All in all, for $25, you can’t go wrong. Despite being pretty much the only option at this point, it’s definitely not a bad buy. Phottix recently released theirs, but it looks like the exact same product for twice as much (yay Phottix!). I was hoping theirs at least wouldn’t have to rely on the use of a sync cable, but from what I’ve read any grip for the D3100 will.
Recently, I was made aware of a huge omission in my original review. The box art is thoroughly misleading, and actually appears to be a stylized photo of the MB-D80 or another more expensive Nikon grip. Contrary to what it shows, this grip does not have a shutter lock (as mentioned above), nor does it have a dial that allows you to adjust aperture/shutter speed. To be fair, it looks like the manufacturer just uses the same box for whatever grip they’re selling (they just slap a sticker on the front with the compatible camera’s make and model), but it’s still very misleading.
So today I go to unplug the sync cable from the camera body and–holy crap–the plug disengaged from the mount part leaving me with a useless sync cable and the rest of the USB plug stuck in the camera.
I guess I’m going to have to roll without a vertical shutter for awhile. No idea where to get a replacement that’s the same size and has the same inputs. Amazon, here I come!
After contacting all of the manufacturers that I could find that make this grip, here are the results. Obviously, your responses may vary so I’ve included the email addresses.
- Phottix (firstname.lastname@example.org): The only company that apparently sells the cable by itself, though it seems like a bit of a crapshoot. The email I received simply said to send $9 via Paypal to email@example.com along with a shipping address. If that’s true, that would put the cable at around a quarter of the price of the grip itself, but at least it’s an option.
- Phottix Europe (firstname.lastname@example.org): After the first initial response requesting more information on where I purchased the grip, I received no further replies.
- Zeikos (email@example.com): Though the good people at Zeikos responded saying they don’t sell the cable separately, they will replace the entire grip and the broken cable. Apparently you can send it directly to their warehouse (though they requested I send the original email claim along with it): ZEIKOS INC. 351 Manhattan Ave. Jersey City, NJ 07302.
- Vivitar/Sakar (firstname.lastname@example.org): Vivitar/Sakar sounded like they might be more help if you’ve still got your proof of purchase, but eventually they told me they don’t sell the cable separately. Although they did thank me for using Sakar International, the leader in technology.
- Meike (email@example.com): No response.
- Bower (firstname.lastname@example.org): No response.